未分类题

某施工单位承担了某综合办公楼的施工任务,并与建设单位签订了该项目建设工程施工合同,合同价3200万元人民币,合同工期28个月。某监理单位受建设单位委托承担了该项目的施工阶段监理任务,并签订了监理合同。在工程施工过程中,遭受暴风雨不可抗力的袭击,造成了相应的损失。施工单位在事件发生后一周内向监理工程师提出索赔要求,并附索赔有关的材料和证据。施工单位的索赔要求如下:
1.遭暴风雨袭击造成的损失,应由建设单位承担赔偿责任。
2.已建部分工程造成破坏,损失26万元,应由建设单位承担修复的经济责任。
3.此灾害造成施工单位人员8人受伤。处理伤病医疗费用和补偿金总计2.8万元,建设单位应给予补偿。
4.施工单位现场使用的机械、设备受到损坏,造成损失6万元;由于现场停工造成机械台班费损失2万元,工人窝工费4.8万元,建设单位应承担修复和停工的经济责任。
5.此灾害造成现场停工5天,要求合同工期顺延5天。
6.由于工程被破坏,清理现场需费用2.5万元,应由建设单位支付。
问题
1.不可抗力造成损失的承担原则是什么?
2.如何处理施工单位提出的要求?

【参考答案】

1.因不可抗力事件导致的人员伤亡、财产损失及其费用增加,发承包双方应按以下原则分别承担并调整合同价款和工期。
①......

(↓↓↓ 点击下方‘点击查看答案’看完整答案 ↓↓↓)
热门 试题

未分类题
Do we need cities any moreI don't want to live in a city. Perhaps we divide naturally into two types: those for whom cities are vibrant and exciting, a focus for human activity; and those for whom they are dirty, noisy and dangerous. It may be unfashionable, but I'm in the latter camp. I do not believe that we are a species whose behavior. improves in overcrowded conditions.A new study proposes a significant increase in the capacity of towns and cities through a combination of increased housing densities, lower on-plot provision for cars and more on-street parking, and the re-use of marginal open space that is empty of any amenity valuE.The benefit of this approach is to reduce the loss of green fields and to help 'move towards more sustainable patterns of development'.This study suggests that it would be possible to achieve a 25% increase in density in a typical provincial city without changing the traditional street scene, although it would be necessary to reduce the size of the houses and substitute parking spaces for garages. Therefore, the cost of this approach is to have more people living in smaller homes at higher densities, along streets that are lined with parked cars. Can we really accept the notion that space within dwellings may be reduced even further? In times when, we are told, living standards are rising in real terms, is it realistic to seek to reduce personal space standards?The streets of many inner suburbs are already lined with cars on both sides, reducing movement to a single lanE.Increasing densities means accepting urban streets that are designed as linear car parks, bounded by even smaller living units and modified only by occasional trees growing from the tarmaC.Would the benefits of higher density be worth the disadvantages of increasing on-street parking? Can we achieve a satisfactory visual environment from such raw materials? Higher urban densities may be communally good for us, but they will fail to meet the desire of many prospective home owners.Those without economic choice can be directed to live in this way, but if we are to continue to rely on the private sector to produce this urban housing, it will need to appeal to the private developers' customers. Who will choose to live in these high-density developments of small dwellings, with minimal open space and a chance to park on the highway if you are lucky enough to find a space? The main consumers will be single people, couples without children, and perhaps some 'empty nesters'. These are people who can choose to spend much of their time outside their home, making the most of those urban cultural opportunities or getting away at weekends to a country cottage of sporting activities.The combination of a young family and a mortgage restricts the mobility and spending power of many couples. Most people with a family will try to avoid bringing up their children in an overcrowded flat or housE.Space for independent activity is important in developing the individual and in maintaining family balancE.The garden is the secure place where the children can work off excess energy.There is danger that planners may take a dispassionate, logical view of how we should live, and seek to force society into that shapE.A few years ago a European Commission study provided a good example of this. It took the view, quite sensibly, that housing should not be under-occupied because this is a waste of resources. Therefore, it would be much better if the many thousands of old ladies who live alone in large detached houses would move into small urban flats, thus releasing the large houses for families. What the study failed to recognize was that many of those old ladies prefer to continue to live in their family home with their familiar surroundings and, most importantly, with their memories. What is good for us is not necessarily what we want.A.YB.NC.NG
A.B.
C.
D.
E.
F.A.Y
B.N